choice-metrics.com

Posted: **Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:13 pm**

Good day,

I have 2 unlabelled alternatives and a status quo option. The status quo option is wetcon[0], infedu[12], toupre[2.5] and a price attribute hhtax[0]. Attribute A is a dummy with 3 levels (1,2,0) where 0 is the base. I am new to Ngene.

If you want to fix the levels of the other attributes, you can do that also, but please be careful. If you read the most recent posts, you will see doing this can cause issues with dummy codes.

In light of the above quote, what measures can I take to ensure that issues with dummy codes in the status quo option (in the syntax) are minimised?

Code: Select all

Design
;alts = alt1, alt2, sq
;rows = 12
;eff = (mnl,d,mean)
;bdraws = gauss(1)
;model:
U(alt1) = b2.dummy[(n,0.169831,0.086648)|(n,0.339661,0.086648)] * wetcon[1,2,0] + 
              b3[(n,0.05661,0.014441)] * infedu[8,12,16] + 
              b4[(n,0.069674,0.017774)] * toupre[1,2.5,5,7.5] + 
              b5[(n,-0.011322,0.00525)] * hhtax[0,10,20,40,80,120]/
U(alt2) = b2 * wetcon +
              b3 * infedu + 
              b4 * toupre + 
              b5 * hhtax /
U(sq) = b2 * wetcon1[0] + 
           b3 * infedu1[12] + 
           b4 * toupre1[2.5] + 
           b5 * hhtax1[0] $

I have also tried to run another syntax where I did not specify the status quo option in the model. My concern with is that where there is a 0 price in either alt1 or alt2, that alternative in some instances becomes inherently dominant. I think the respondent is likely to make a choice between that alt with a 0 price and the status quo. Please advise.

Code: Select all

Design
;alts = alt1*, alt2*, sq
;rows = 12
;eff = (mnl,d,mean)
;bdraws = gauss(1)
;model:
U(alt1) = b2.dummy[(n,0.169831,0.086648)|(n,0.339661,0.086648)] * wetcon[1,2,0] + 
              b3[(n,0.05661,0.014441)] * infedu[8,12,16] + 
              b4[(n,0.069674,0.017774)] * toupre[1,2.5,5,7.5] + 
              b5[(n,-0.011322,0.00525)] * hhtax[0,10,20,40,80,120]/
U(alt2) = b2 * wetcon + 
              b3 * infedu + 
              b4 * toupre + 
              b5 * hhtax $

I could not run the first syntax and the latter ran but had 4 choice tasks that had 0 price or household tax increment in alt1 or alt2 which were dominant.

The last syntax I have does not include the 0 price in alt1 and alt2. If there is no solution to design 1 and 2, can I use design 3 below and specify SQ in the DCE survey?

Code: Select all

Design
;alts = alt1*, alt2*, sq
;rows = 12
;eff = (mnl,d,mean)
;bdraws = gauss(1)
;model:
U(alt1) = b2.dummy[(n,0.169831,0.086648)|(n,0.339661,0.086648)] * wetcon[1,2,0] + 
              b3[(n,0.05661,0.014441)] * infedu[8,12,16] + 
              b4[(n,0.069674,0.017774)] * toupre[1,2.5,5,7.5] + 
              b5[(n,-0.011322,0.00525)] * hhtax[5,10,20,40,80,120]/
U(alt2) = b2 * wetcon + 
              b3 * infedu + 
              b4 * toupre + 
              b5 * hhtax $

Thank you,

Linda

Posted: **Fri Jul 20, 2018 3:41 pm**

I believe that this syntax would do what you are looking for?

Code: Select all

Design
;alts = alt1*, alt2*, sq
;rows = 12
;eff = (mnl,d,mean)
;alg = mfederov(candidates = 10000)
;require:
sq.wetcon = 0, sq.infedu = 12, sq.toupre = 2.5,sq.hhtax = 0
;bdraws = gauss(1)
;model:
U(alt1) = b2.dummy[(n,0.169831,0.086648)|(n,0.339661,0.086648)] * wetcon[1,2,0] +
              b3[(n,0.05661,0.014441)] * infedu[8,12,16] +
              b4[(n,0.069674,0.017774)] * toupre[1,2.5,5,7.5] +
              b5[(n,-0.011322,0.00525)] * hhtax[0,10,20,40,80,120] /
U(alt2) = b2 * wetcon +
              b3 * infedu +
              b4 * toupre +
              b5 * hhtax /
U(sq) = b6[0]+ 
           b2 * wetcon +
           b3 * infedu +
           b4 * toupre +
           b5 * hhtax 
$

Note that the design will not be attribute level balanced, not every level may appear.

Michiel

Posted: **Fri Jul 20, 2018 9:22 pm**

Thank you so much, Prof!

Yes, this is want I am looking for

Grateful,

Linda

choice-metrics.com

Dummy coding in SQ

Dummy coding in SQ

Re: Dummy coding in SQ

Re: Dummy coding in SQ