Dear Administrators,
I got pilot data of 120 households (each household gets 6 CE cards), but not all estimates are significant. While some marginally significant parameters (up to 20% significance level) make intuitive sense, those insignificant parameters show unexpected sign. I was wondering if ...
Search found 3 matches
- Mon Dec 08, 2014 11:51 pm
- Forum: General questions about choice experiments
- Topic: insignificant priors from the pilot data
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8483
- Thu Jul 10, 2014 8:35 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: optimal probability balance
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8287
Re: optimal probability balance
Dear John,
Many thanks for your clarification. I really appreicate. I just wanted to follow up on your explanations.
I understood that the probabilities must be close to 50-50% because of the small priors I assumed in the design. These small priors are in the design to indicate a sign rather than ...
Many thanks for your clarification. I really appreicate. I just wanted to follow up on your explanations.
I understood that the probabilities must be close to 50-50% because of the small priors I assumed in the design. These small priors are in the design to indicate a sign rather than ...
- Sat Jul 05, 2014 12:38 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: optimal probability balance
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8287
optimal probability balance
Dear Ngene developers,
I am working on designing a choice experiment for a developing country in order to determine WTP for water and wastewater service attributes and was wondering if you would be able to comment on my issue of striking optimal probability balance. The following code has been ...
I am working on designing a choice experiment for a developing country in order to determine WTP for water and wastewater service attributes and was wondering if you would be able to comment on my issue of striking optimal probability balance. The following code has been ...