choice-metrics.com

Perfect, thanks!

Hi Andrew,
Yes for some reason it did worked now! I'm so glad, this is a great solution for many of my designs...
Last thing..your understanding was right - I wanted the three remaining levels.
So just to be by writing :
;reject:
small.engagement<>large.engagement,

small.engagement=1 and small ...

Hi Andrew,thanks much!
I've tried the design, yet it retrieved the following error massage: Error in Command 1: Unexpected command ';alg=neldermead' or missing a main command such as 'Design'.

I actually run a shorter code since there are only 3 cost level for each engagement type for each system ...

Hi again,
I tried to figure out my self how to solve the question I asked in my last post (it possible to attach different cost levels to each engagement type that is being employed (1,2 and 3) here, by running this design. since I am running a "scenario in scenario" type of design in which the ...

Dear Andrew,
Thank you very much for your replies! Actually the first code worked perfectly though I never used the this type of programming (16-20,16-20,16-20), and I'll be happy to know what it stands for (I did not find in the manual)
The question I still have is does it possible to attach ...

Dear Ngene users,
I have ran the following labeled Bayesian efficient design (after conducting a pilot):
Design
;alts = small, large, optout
;rows=54
;block=9
;eff=(mnl,d)
;rep = 450
;rdraws=halton
;model:
U(small) = c2+ b4.dummy[(u, 1.96, 3.34)|(u, 2.34, 3.81)]*engagement[0,1,2]+ b5[(u,-0.01,-0.004 ...