Search found 7 matches
- Fri May 24, 2024 3:58 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: An efficient design with zero priors
- Replies: 2
- Views: 28274
Re: An efficient design with zero priors
Thank you so much, Michiel!
- Fri May 24, 2024 4:32 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: An efficient design with zero priors
- Replies: 2
- Views: 28274
An efficient design with zero priors
Hi,
I am trying to estimate an efficient design with zero priors (except price considering the economic theory) and I am not sure which of these two (if any) is the most appropriate one.
This is my first syntax, where I use continuous variables without defining a baseline:
Design
;alts = alt1 ...
I am trying to estimate an efficient design with zero priors (except price considering the economic theory) and I am not sure which of these two (if any) is the most appropriate one.
This is my first syntax, where I use continuous variables without defining a baseline:
Design
;alts = alt1 ...
- Thu May 09, 2024 6:06 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Labeled design
- Replies: 4
- Views: 34010
Re: Labeled design
Thank you so much Michiel! You are a savior!
- Thu May 09, 2024 5:14 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Labeled design
- Replies: 4
- Views: 34010
Re: Labeled design
My apologies for the confusion!
The design was successfully executed using 'sim'.
Correct, the 'actual situation' represents the status quo alternative. I am including the opt-out option instead of the status quo because the values of the status quo are all zeros.
In my study, we are examining ...
The design was successfully executed using 'sim'.
Correct, the 'actual situation' represents the status quo alternative. I am including the opt-out option instead of the status quo because the values of the status quo are all zeros.
In my study, we are examining ...
- Wed May 08, 2024 6:43 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Labeled design
- Replies: 4
- Views: 34010
Labeled design
Hello,
I have never used a labeled design before and would like some guidance.
These are my variables:
*1. Composition = 1 (wood), 2(hay), 3(rice) (actual situation)
*2. Durability = 1, 2, 3 (actual n/a)
*3. Water = 1%, 2%, 3% (actual 0%)
*4. Price = 11, 22, 33 (actual payment 0)
In this case ...
I have never used a labeled design before and would like some guidance.
These are my variables:
*1. Composition = 1 (wood), 2(hay), 3(rice) (actual situation)
*2. Durability = 1, 2, 3 (actual n/a)
*3. Water = 1%, 2%, 3% (actual 0%)
*4. Price = 11, 22, 33 (actual payment 0)
In this case ...
- Mon Apr 15, 2024 4:32 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Choice experiment with interactions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 17267
Re: Choice experiment with interactions
Thank you Michiel!
- Wed Apr 10, 2024 6:23 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Choice experiment with interactions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 17267
Choice experiment with interactions
Hello,
I used the following orthogonal design to generate a choice experiment (CE) with three attributes, and NO interactions. Yet for my curiosity, I estimated an RPL with interactions between b3 and b4 and received good results that make sense. My question:
Can I use and interpret these ...
I used the following orthogonal design to generate a choice experiment (CE) with three attributes, and NO interactions. Yet for my curiosity, I estimated an RPL with interactions between b3 and b4 and received good results that make sense. My question:
Can I use and interpret these ...