Hi,
below is the syntax I used to generate a Bayesian efficient design.
Design
;alts = alt1*, alt2*,alt3*
;rows = 24
;block = 6
;eff = (mnl,d,mean)
;model:
U(alt1) = colour.dummy[(n,-1.16,0.35)|(n,-1.19,0.37)|(n,-1.62,0.36)] * colour[0,1,2,3] + b3[(u,-1,0)] * taste[0,1]+ b4[(n,-0.58,0.23 ...
Search found 10 matches
- Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:23 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: generating priors
- Replies: 12
- Views: 22954
- Fri Jun 07, 2013 8:19 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: generating priors
- Replies: 12
- Views: 22954
Re: generating priors
hullo Michiel,
I got your feedback and it answers my question. thank you.
regards,
medard
I got your feedback and it answers my question. thank you.
regards,
medard
- Fri Jun 07, 2013 3:24 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: generating priors
- Replies: 12
- Views: 22954
Re: generating priors
hi,
the last time I asked about use of priors are that are not significant, you told me to use a Bayesian efficient design for a prior that is marginally insignificant. now suppose I have a prior that is very insignificant, do I still use it in that way?
secondly, I ran a binary logit with no ...
the last time I asked about use of priors are that are not significant, you told me to use a Bayesian efficient design for a prior that is marginally insignificant. now suppose I have a prior that is very insignificant, do I still use it in that way?
secondly, I ran a binary logit with no ...
- Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:09 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: generating priors
- Replies: 12
- Views: 22954
Re: generating priors
Hi Andrew,
thank you, together with your entire team
regards medard
thank you, together with your entire team
regards medard
- Fri May 24, 2013 7:02 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: generating priors
- Replies: 12
- Views: 22954
Re: generating priors
hi,
can I say the I will use a binary logit to analyze data from pilot survey since I don't have the third alternative of opt-out?
secondly, can I use the RPL on the pilot survey data with two alternatives?
medard
can I say the I will use a binary logit to analyze data from pilot survey since I don't have the third alternative of opt-out?
secondly, can I use the RPL on the pilot survey data with two alternatives?
medard
- Thu May 23, 2013 11:45 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: generating priors
- Replies: 12
- Views: 22954
generating priors
Greetings Michiel
I have two questions though they seem to be general.
in generating orthogonal designs to use in the pilot survey, do I need to include the "opt-out" option or it only appears during efficient design?
secondly, while analyzing data for the pilot study to obtain priors, do I ...
I have two questions though they seem to be general.
in generating orthogonal designs to use in the pilot survey, do I need to include the "opt-out" option or it only appears during efficient design?
secondly, while analyzing data for the pilot study to obtain priors, do I ...
- Mon May 06, 2013 10:09 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: labelling alternatives
- Replies: 7
- Views: 17086
Re: labelling alternatives
hullo Michael,
I try to get your explanation. my question still is how to obtain the two priors for the two levels if I had not provided for two parameters in the initial utility function. I thought that in order to obtain two priors, I must have made a provision for two parameter estimates in the ...
I try to get your explanation. my question still is how to obtain the two priors for the two levels if I had not provided for two parameters in the initial utility function. I thought that in order to obtain two priors, I must have made a provision for two parameter estimates in the ...
- Mon May 06, 2013 6:59 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: labelling alternatives
- Replies: 7
- Views: 17086
Re: labelling alternatives
Dear Michael,
thank you for the feedback. am trying all the options that you are giving. though you already pointed out that my questions are general, am gaining a lot from you. my interest is actually to investigate attributes of each product and vary them in order to capture trade-offs between ...
thank you for the feedback. am trying all the options that you are giving. though you already pointed out that my questions are general, am gaining a lot from you. my interest is actually to investigate attributes of each product and vary them in order to capture trade-offs between ...
- Thu May 02, 2013 10:57 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: labelling alternatives
- Replies: 7
- Views: 17086
Re: labelling alternatives
hullo Michael,
I posted a question about labeling alternatives. you said it more of a general question. to be specific, the background of my study is thus: there is limited demand for sorghum products due to undesirable attributes in the current sorghum varieties. the aim of my study is to determine ...
I posted a question about labeling alternatives. you said it more of a general question. to be specific, the background of my study is thus: there is limited demand for sorghum products due to undesirable attributes in the current sorghum varieties. the aim of my study is to determine ...
- Wed May 01, 2013 4:32 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: labelling alternatives
- Replies: 7
- Views: 17086
labelling alternatives
hullo, am doing a study on preferences for sorghum grain. am specifically studying three products made out of the grain, that is, porridge, beer and bread. my question is whether I should make a design for each of the products. which is the best way to handle this? what complicates the matter is the ...