Dear Michiel,
Thank you very much for your answer. Your syntax works indeed. That's really helpful.
Have a nice day,
Carla
Search found 3 matches
- Mon Feb 15, 2021 7:27 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: No Valid design due to potential misspecifications
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8624
- Sat Feb 13, 2021 1:11 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: No Valid design due to potential misspecifications
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8624
Re: No Valid design due to potential misspecifications
Hi all,
As a follow up from my previous message, It looks like the problem comes from specifying the utility of the reference alternative (all attribute levels known). If I don't include a utility function for alt3 but instead include the corresponding constant in alt1 and alt2, then NGene ...
As a follow up from my previous message, It looks like the problem comes from specifying the utility of the reference alternative (all attribute levels known). If I don't include a utility function for alt3 but instead include the corresponding constant in alt1 and alt2, then NGene ...
- Thu Feb 11, 2021 11:39 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: No Valid design due to potential misspecifications
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8624
No Valid design due to potential misspecifications
Dear all,
I am still learning about CE and I would like to have your insights into a problem I am facing.
I am trying to make a D-efficient (before making a Bayesian efficient one) for a CE presenting 3 varieties alternatives to farmers: 2 hypothetical varieties (alt1 and alt2) and 1 reference ...
I am still learning about CE and I would like to have your insights into a problem I am facing.
I am trying to make a D-efficient (before making a Bayesian efficient one) for a CE presenting 3 varieties alternatives to farmers: 2 hypothetical varieties (alt1 and alt2) and 1 reference ...