Thank you very much for the quick and very useful answer Michiel!
You helped me a lot!
Have a nice day!
Peter
Search found 14 matches
- Sun Jul 04, 2021 1:50 am
- Forum: General questions about choice experiments
- Topic: Question about the beginnings
- Replies: 2
- Views: 14810
- Fri Jul 02, 2021 6:46 pm
- Forum: General questions about choice experiments
- Topic: Question about the beginnings
- Replies: 2
- Views: 14810
Question about the beginnings
Hi Michiel!
I have a (maybe too general) question about starting a study.
An orthogonal or an efficient (without any priors) design is the best way to conduct a pilot study?
Have any advantages of efficient design without any prior parameters or worth to use an orthogonal design in the first ...
I have a (maybe too general) question about starting a study.
An orthogonal or an efficient (without any priors) design is the best way to conduct a pilot study?
Have any advantages of efficient design without any prior parameters or worth to use an orthogonal design in the first ...
- Tue Mar 16, 2021 1:16 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Decision situations with dominan alternative
- Replies: 12
- Views: 27157
Re: Decision situations with dominan alternative
It worked perfectly!
Thank you very much for your help!
Thank you very much for your help!
- Sun Mar 14, 2021 7:58 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Decision situations with dominan alternative
- Replies: 12
- Views: 27157
Re: Decision situations with dominan alternative
Hi Michiel,
Sorry for the many questions!
In the meantime, I have successfully completed a pilot study using the recommended design:
design
;alts = Service_A*, Service_B*, Service_C*, Service_D*
;rows = 8
;block = 2
;eff = (mnl,d)
;alg = mfederov
;model:
U(Service_A) = b2[0.0001] * int[0,1 ...
Sorry for the many questions!
In the meantime, I have successfully completed a pilot study using the recommended design:
design
;alts = Service_A*, Service_B*, Service_C*, Service_D*
;rows = 8
;block = 2
;eff = (mnl,d)
;alg = mfederov
;model:
U(Service_A) = b2[0.0001] * int[0,1 ...
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 11:52 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Decision situations with dominan alternative
- Replies: 12
- Views: 27157
Re: Decision situations with dominan alternative
Became clear!
Thank you very much!
Thank you very much!
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 11:37 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Decision situations with dominan alternative
- Replies: 12
- Views: 27157
Re: Decision situations with dominan alternative
Dear Michiel!
I would have another question about the Modified Federov algorithm.
How can we determine the values of constraints in case of Modified Federov algorithm.
Is it based on the number of alternatives in decision situations, and the number of attribute levels?
You suggested above that ...
I would have another question about the Modified Federov algorithm.
How can we determine the values of constraints in case of Modified Federov algorithm.
Is it based on the number of alternatives in decision situations, and the number of attribute levels?
You suggested above that ...
- Wed Feb 17, 2021 9:16 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Decision situations with dominan alternative
- Replies: 12
- Views: 27157
Re: Decision situations with dominan alternative
Thank you very much!
It became absolutely clear.
Best regards,
Peter
It became absolutely clear.
Best regards,
Peter
- Wed Feb 17, 2021 4:34 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Decision situations with dominan alternative
- Replies: 12
- Views: 27157
Re: Decision situations with dominan alternative
Maybe a silly question and probably I asked strangely.
I try to creat a maybe better understandable example below.
If I want to analyse three different type of labels (label of origin, fairtrade label, bio label).
What is the main difference between the following ways:
1. I separately use this ...
I try to creat a maybe better understandable example below.
If I want to analyse three different type of labels (label of origin, fairtrade label, bio label).
What is the main difference between the following ways:
1. I separately use this ...
- Tue Feb 16, 2021 3:39 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Decision situations with dominan alternative
- Replies: 12
- Views: 27157
Re: Decision situations with dominan alternative
Dear Michiel!
Thank you very much for your help!
It worked!
In meantime, another question arised in me. Another approach.
In this case, I have only 2 attributes (with 3-5 levels).
What is the difference if I handle the two-level attributes as the following:
design
;alts = Service_A, Service_B ...
Thank you very much for your help!
It worked!
In meantime, another question arised in me. Another approach.
In this case, I have only 2 attributes (with 3-5 levels).
What is the difference if I handle the two-level attributes as the following:
design
;alts = Service_A, Service_B ...
- Wed Feb 10, 2021 3:04 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Decision situations with dominan alternative
- Replies: 12
- Views: 27157
Decision situations with dominan alternative
Hi Michiel,
I have tried to run two design in Ngene and I have some problem.
For design 1:
I have 4 attributes with 2-2-2-5 levels (in unlabelled case).
My design is the following:
design
;alts = Service_A, Service_B, Service_C, Service_D
;rows = 8
;block = 2
;eff = (mnl,d)
;model:
U(Service_A ...
I have tried to run two design in Ngene and I have some problem.
For design 1:
I have 4 attributes with 2-2-2-5 levels (in unlabelled case).
My design is the following:
design
;alts = Service_A, Service_B, Service_C, Service_D
;rows = 8
;block = 2
;eff = (mnl,d)
;model:
U(Service_A ...