Indeed, thanks! Alright I might go the 5 row design then, which is more simple. Again, thank you for your very very valuable help, this is always reassuring.
Using blocks (option 2) does increase efficiency compared to option 3 where I only have 5 rows. So I might go for option 2 even though it is harder. It would not be that hard if I could trick Ngene to generate the choice sets of block 1 first (i.e ...
I have now run the pilot and I realize that 8 choices (+ the rationality test at the end) is too much: it seems to discourage the companies to answer. Therefore I am thinking of presenting them with only 4 choice sets (+ rationality test at the end). I have a few doubts regarding how ...
Waouh, this makes everything clear in my mind, thanks so much for your time. Then I will decide between a heterogeneous pivot design and separating e.g. 30 different designs that span all possible prices (which would indeed be more accurate).
If I decide to generate separately a large number of ...
1- Do you agree that it is not possible to generate a heterogeneous design on the fly if I am not sure about the exact number of status quos my respondents may have? Here is my reasoning. My respondents will select the price of their current product (i.e ...
1- You understood perfectly what I am trying to do indeed. That is true that Hep, Lbl and Reg are not actually pivoted. But is it ok to "pivot" differently the reference alternative to get Alternatives A and B? So that indeed, in the end, the levels of attributes ...
Thanks a lot for your hard work in making the NGENE manual so clear, it helped me a lot understanding things! This is the first time I am making a choice experiment design and I would be really glad if I could get your feedback on a few points for my quite complex design.