Good day.
If we would like to reference the Ngene manual in a paper, how would you prefer this be done?
Kind regards.
Search found 17 matches
- Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:37 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Referencing the Ngene Manual
- Replies: 2
- Views: 10570
- Mon Apr 02, 2012 11:59 pm
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Dominated alternatives.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 35494
Re: Dominated alternatives.
Thank you Michiel.
That's exactly what I needed to know
Have a great day.
That's exactly what I needed to know
Have a great day.
- Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:00 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Dominated alternatives.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 35494
Re: Dominated alternatives.
Hello Michiel.
You're right - the design does run with setting the number of candidates to 100.
The problem in our case is indeed that the status quo alternative is the base (all the levels of the status quo do not vary with the alternatives presented in the choices).... while this may not be ideal ...
You're right - the design does run with setting the number of candidates to 100.
The problem in our case is indeed that the status quo alternative is the base (all the levels of the status quo do not vary with the alternatives presented in the choices).... while this may not be ideal ...
- Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:17 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Dominated alternatives.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 35494
Re: Dominated alternatives.
Yes, new version and exactly the same syntax.
Tried it on two computers (which are both very good computers), but it doesn't seem to run without crashing the program....
I did get it to run once yesterday... but since then not again.
I tried to adjust the code to specify
alt2.size>0
also, because ...
Tried it on two computers (which are both very good computers), but it doesn't seem to run without crashing the program....
I did get it to run once yesterday... but since then not again.
I tried to adjust the code to specify
alt2.size>0
also, because ...
- Thu Mar 29, 2012 1:07 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Dominated alternatives.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 35494
Re: Dominated alternatives.
Hi Michiel.
Looks like a great design - would love to try it, but the program crashes every time I try to run it. I've tried on 2 computers now - no success.
Any tips?
Thanks again!
Looks like a great design - would love to try it, but the program crashes every time I try to run it. I've tried on 2 computers now - no success.
Any tips?
Thanks again!
- Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:37 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Dominated alternatives.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 35494
Re: Dominated alternatives.
Hi Michiel.
Thank you so much for that quick reply.
I was trying what you mentioned, but I also wanted to incorporate the effects-coded nature that the final model I use will take - and I noticed that doesn't work if I specify the status quo the way you showed me. The other issue with our status ...
Thank you so much for that quick reply.
I was trying what you mentioned, but I also wanted to incorporate the effects-coded nature that the final model I use will take - and I noticed that doesn't work if I specify the status quo the way you showed me. The other issue with our status ...
- Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:03 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Dominated alternatives.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 35494
Re: Dominated alternatives.
I have tried to simplify the problem by taking the uncertainty of the priors out as well as reduce dominance by starring the alternatives as in the following code:
Design
;alts(m1)= alt1*,alt2*,sq
;rows=24
;block=3
;eff= M1(mnl,d)
;model(m1):
U(alt1) = b2[0.099]*dist[5,8,12,18] + b3[-0.0028]*size ...
Design
;alts(m1)= alt1*,alt2*,sq
;rows=24
;block=3
;eff= M1(mnl,d)
;model(m1):
U(alt1) = b2[0.099]*dist[5,8,12,18] + b3[-0.0028]*size ...
- Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:45 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: Dominated alternatives.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 35494
Dominated alternatives.
Hello.
I am trying to create a choice experiment with 5 attributes in which we try to value the WTP for different elements of a renewable energy product.
The attributes have the following levels: distance (4), size (3), carbon reduced (4), jobs created (4), fee added monthly to electricity bill (8 ...
I am trying to create a choice experiment with 5 attributes in which we try to value the WTP for different elements of a renewable energy product.
The attributes have the following levels: distance (4), size (3), carbon reduced (4), jobs created (4), fee added monthly to electricity bill (8 ...
- Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:37 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: conditions and rejections
- Replies: 5
- Views: 13302
Re: conditions and rejections
Hi Andrew.
I tried what you suggested, but even in the last 50 designs, there is always at least one case where the status quo option is reflected in one of the alternatives.
Is there no other way to do this? Do you have any other ideas?
Thanks a lot for your assistance - much appreciated.
I tried what you suggested, but even in the last 50 designs, there is always at least one case where the status quo option is reflected in one of the alternatives.
Is there no other way to do this? Do you have any other ideas?
Thanks a lot for your assistance - much appreciated.
- Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:23 am
- Forum: Support for Ngene Desktop (v1.x)
- Topic: conditions and rejections
- Replies: 5
- Views: 13302
Re: conditions and rejections
Hi John.
Sure! Thanks for getting to this so quickly. Below is the code without the ;reject: included. The last condition already addressed the issue where an alternative had the same levels as the status quo, but a better environmental condition and so clearly dominated the status quo.
Thanks ...
Sure! Thanks for getting to this so quickly. Below is the code without the ;reject: included. The last condition already addressed the issue where an alternative had the same levels as the status quo, but a better environmental condition and so clearly dominated the status quo.
Thanks ...