Search found 3 matches

by lich93
Mon Oct 08, 2018 9:46 am
Forum: General questions about choice experiments
Topic: Unlabeled design Syntax & Statistical Efficiency Criterion
Replies: 1
Views: 8769

Unlabeled design Syntax & Statistical Efficiency Criterion

Dear moderators,

I am creating a DCE design for pilot study now, and for a nationwide survey later on. The design is as follows:

Design
;alts = FVRmax, FVRsom, FVRstq
;rows = 15
;block = 3
;eff = (mnl,d)
;model:
U(FVRmax) = b1*ATR[2,1,0] + b2*ADM[2,1,0] + b3*AFR[2,1,0] + b4*OFI[2,1,0] + b5*PLFP[2 ...
by lich93
Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:43 am
Forum: General questions about choice experiments
Topic: help in orthogonal or efficient design syntax
Replies: 1
Views: 8127

Re: help in orthogonal or efficient design syntax

Hi again,

I also tried with efficient designs, and the syntax is as follows:
?D-efficient Design with 5 levels in the cost attribute
Design
;alts = FVRmax, FVRsom, FVRstq
;rows = 15
;block = 3
;eff = (mnl,d)
;model:
U(FVRmax) = b1*ATR[2,1,0] + b2*ADM[2,1,0] + b3*AFR[2,1,0] + b4*OFI[2,1,0] + b5 ...
by lich93
Sat Oct 06, 2018 2:37 pm
Forum: General questions about choice experiments
Topic: help in orthogonal or efficient design syntax
Replies: 1
Views: 8127

help in orthogonal or efficient design syntax

Dear all,
I am considering the following elements in a CE design:
3 alternatives: status quo (0), some improvement (1), and much improvement (2)
6 attributes with the same 3 levels (0,1,2), and 1 local fee attribute (Tax) with 5 levels (-10% -5%, 0%, +5%, +10%) showing percentage increase/decrease ...